Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Abhijit Menon-Sen
Subject Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date
Msg-id ZGtxyLcBJhYEjbkH@toroid.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 2023-05-22 09:42:44 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > I noticed that the value that enables this feature at libpq client side
> > is 'enable'.  However, for other Boolean settings like sslsni,
> > keepalives, requiressl, sslcompression, the value that enables feature
> > is '1' -- we use strings only for "enum" type of settings.
> 
> > Also, it looks like connectOptions2() doesn't validate the string value.
> 
> Hmm, it certainly seems like this ought to accept exactly the
> same inputs as other libpq boolean settings.  I can take a look
> unless somebody else is already on it.

I'm working on it.

-- Abhijit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: RFI: Extending the TOAST Pointer