Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date
Msg-id ZGmPocUZ3cl9VQm+@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 11:21:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 09:33:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> With less then 48 hours to beta 1 packaging, I have made this change and
> >> adjusted internal variable to match.
> 
> > The buildfarm and cfbot seem unhappy with 9c0a0e2.  It looks like there are
> > a few remaining uses of gss_accept_deleg to rename.  I'm planning to commit
> > the attached patch shortly.
> 
> I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection
> parameter and so on?  I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats
> me to it.

Oh, I didn't consider those.  I thought we would leave libpq alone since
those are often supplied on the command line and there are existing
short-style libpq options, e.g., gssencmode, krbsrvname, sslcrl.

I am fine with such a change though.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg