On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Yes, I had thought about adding "{}", too, but decided that this would
> arguably improve reading, but inarguably raise formalization questions.
> So I would leave "()" as done in v5.
Ok, cool. Let's go with v5 for now, then.
The format output could be tweaked forever, so if there are arguments
for more improvements, we could always discuss that later as adapted
and the tests will be here to provide coverage. I am planning to
apply and backpatch that down to v14 tomorrow.
--
Michael
