Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Date
Msg-id ZFnnWRqn4PJegIyJ@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 02:10:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Should we split this patch into two parts, as they aim at tackling two
> different cases then?  One for LWLockConflictsWithVar() and
> LWLockReleaseClearVar() which are the straight-forward pieces
> (using one pg_atomic_write_u64() in LWLockUpdateVar instead), then
> a second for LWLockUpdateVar()?

I have been studying that a bit more, and I'd like to take this
suggestion back.  Apologies for the noise.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOC] Update ALTER SUBSCRIPTION documentation