Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Date
Msg-id ZFm+tzHgF6sqyUIa@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 04:04:10PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 05:57:09PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>> test-case 1: -T5, WAL ~16 bytes
>> test-case 1: -t1000, WAL ~16 bytes
>
> I wonder if it's worth doing a couple of long-running tests, too.

Yes, 5s or 1000 transactions per client is too small, though it shows
that things are going in the right direction.

(Will reply to the rest in a bit..)
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Tab completion for CREATE SCHEMAAUTHORIZATION
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP DATABASE is interruptible