On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:46:56PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I'm fairly convinced it's a timeout in the interactive psql session. Given how
> ugly the use of that is I'm sort of waiting for Andres' refactoring patch [0] to
> commit this such that I can rewrite the test in a saner and more robust way.
FWIW, I'd be OK here even if you don't have a test for libpq in the
first change as what you have sent is already testing for the core
machinery in scram-common.c. You could always add one later.
--
Michael
