Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count
Date
Msg-id ZAmGPd7mrqv8Waho@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 05:21:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 09:07:36AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> AFAIK a TAP test with psql_interactive is the only way to do this so that's
>> what I've implemented.

I cannot think of a better idea than what you have here, so I am
marking this patch as ready for committer.  I am wondering how stable
a logic based on a timer of 5s would be..
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often