On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 06:24:59PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> So if the general idea is a guc "vacuum_truncate" which sets a global
> default for whether vacuums and autovacuums should do truncation, and
> we then have the storage parameter which would override the global
> setting. And to be clear, there is also the decision on whether the
> VACUUM commands default should default to truncate=on (like the
> existing behavior) or truncate == vacuum_truncate guc, unless
> explicitly set. I think the latter is probably the right way to go.
Thank you all for the discussion. I've attempted to address the
outstanding feedback into the new version of the patch.
--
nathan
