On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 03:05:09PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Okay, I'll actually look at the patches next...
Ugh, it's already been 10 days since I said that. A couple of thoughts on
0001:
I'm not sure I understand the reason for capping relallfrozen to
relallvisible. From upthread, I gather this is mostly to deal with manual
statistics manipulation, but my first reaction is that we should just let
those values be bogus. Is there something that fundamentally requires
relallfrozen to be <= relallvisible? These are only estimates, so I don't
think it would be that surprising for them to defy this expectation.
Should we allow manipulating relallfrozen like we do relallvisible? My
assumption is that would even be required for the ongoing statistics
import/export work.
Upthread, you mentioned that you weren't seeing relallfrozen in
pg_class_d.h. I checked on my machine and see it there as expected. Are
you still missing it?
--
nathan
