On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 09:08:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Wikipedia seems to agree with you that "fingerprint" would fit for
> this purpose, though:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint_(computing)
>
> Has anybody any comments about that? That would be a large renaming,
> but in the long term is makes sense if we want to apply that to more
> than just parse nodes and query strings. If you do that, it impacts
> the file names and the properties, that are hidden in the backend for
> most of it, except the entry API and JumbleState. This last part
> impacts some extensions and I have been maintaining one a bit
> (pg_hint_plan).
I agree that fingerprint is a good improvement.
>
> Also adding Julien in CC,
> as he has some out-of-core extension code that depends on the jumbling
> structures if I recall correctly.
I do have an extension to support custom fingerprinting logic, but the
introduction of the pg_node_attr based jumbling kind of broke it.
FTR my main motivation was to be able to deal with queries referencing
temporary relations, as if your application creates a lot of those it basically
means that you cannot use pg_stat_statements anymore.
