On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:12:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> writes:
>> I toyed with that for a bit, but as you say, without generating a ton of
>> combinations to translate, we'd have to fall back on run-time
>> constructions. Neither is ideal. I also realized that I almost never type
>> "\dti". Very common for me are \d and \dt and \dv etc. but combinations are
>> something I never bother with. At that point, I just do a \d. I think given
>> how rare (granted, anecdotally) those combinations are, it's okay if we
>> expose people to the "r" word.
>
> Fair. This is already a step forward, so it doesn't have to be
> perfect.
+1. I don't use combinations like \dti regularly, either.
--
nathan