On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:29:53AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Here's an experimental patch to try changing that policy. It improves
> the connection times on my small computer with your test, but I doubt
> I'm seeing the real issue. But in theory, assuming a backlog of
> connections and workers to start, I think each server loop should be
> able to accept and fork one client backend, and fork up to 100
> (MAX_BGWORKERS_TO_LAUNCH) background workers.
Thanks for the quick response! I'm taking a look at the patch...
--
nathan
