Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes
Date
Msg-id Z-Vsmz0qGkywaS71@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes  (Sadeq Dousti <msdousti@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Sadeq Dousti
> Thanks Greg and others for the feedback!
> 
> Please find attached the patch for implementing \dN (including \dNt, \dNi,
> \dNit).

I don't care particularly about the choice of letter, but I think this
is the wrong way round. It should be \dtN instead of \dNt.

Is the form \dN actually useful? For partitioned tables, you'd only
get the empty root indexes. If you actually wanted that, there's still
\dtiN.

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: libpq maligning postgres stability
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN