Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Date
Msg-id CAHgHdKvg0NuKuH_e7LFqwKSS7CDEfjzbL2MpeySX=VdzHrPx1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN  (Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>)
Responses Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:29 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
Hi,

I see this patch didn't move since December :-( I still think these
improvements would be useful, it certainly was very helpful when I was
working on the GIN/GiST parallel builds (the GiST builds stalled, but I
hope to push the GIN patches soon).

So I'd like to get some of this in too. I'm not sure about the GiST
bits, because I know very little about that AM (the parallel builds made
me acutely aware of that).

But I'd like to get the GIN parts in. We're at v34 already, and the
recent changes were mostly cosmetic. Does anyone object to me polishing
and pushing those parts?

Kirill may have addressed my concerns in the latest version.  I have not had time for another review.  Tomas, would you still like to review and push this patch?  I have no objection.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq maligning postgres stability