Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 09:41:21PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:00 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>> I agree with your patch 0001-Deprecate-pg_int64.patch.  I don't see a
>> reason to keep the current arrangement around pg_int64.
> 
> Thanks for looking!  Pushed.

anaconda seems to be upset about this one [0].  I've spent all of 30
seconds looking at it so far, but it appears to be using an old version of
the header file.

In file included from pg_regress.c:34:
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:623:8: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
  623 | extern pg_int64 lo_lseek64(PGconn *conn, int fd, pg_int64 offset, int whence);
      |        ^
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:623:50: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
  623 | extern pg_int64 lo_lseek64(PGconn *conn, int fd, pg_int64 offset, int whence);
      |                                                  ^
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:627:8: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
  627 | extern pg_int64 lo_tell64(PGconn *conn, int fd);
      |        ^
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:629:48: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
  629 | extern int      lo_truncate64(PGconn *conn, int fd, pg_int64 len);
      |                                                     ^
4 errors generated.

[0] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=anaconda&dt=2025-03-25%2021%3A22%3A33

-- 
nathan