Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Date
Msg-id YwgZDna+jiIN9fY/@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:45:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'm leaning towards considering it a feature-change and thus not
> something to backpatch (I'd be OK sneaking it into 15 though, as that
> one is not released yet and it feels like a perfectly *safe* change).
> Not enough to insist on it, but it seems "slightly more correct".

Fine by me if both you and Daniel want to be more careful with this
change.  We could always argue about a backpatch later if there is
more ask for it, as well.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yuya Watari
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation