Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
Date
Msg-id Yo7m0hPxvCI5qMuj@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: Multi-Master Logical Replication  ("kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>)
Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:13:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > You still have not answered my question above.  "Without these features,
> > what workload would this help with?"  You have only explained how the
> > patch would fix one of the many larger problems.
> >
> 
> It helps with setting up logical replication among two or more nodes
> (data flows both ways) which is important for use cases where
> applications are data-aware. For such apps, it will be beneficial to

That does make sense, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Indecision is a decision.  Inaction is an action.  Mark Batterson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: fix stats_fetch_consistency value in postgresql.conf.sample
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial