On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:04:05AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:58 AM Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
>> Now; I do think that the secondd patch, the one that just skips update
>> of the state in control file, is the way to go. The other patch adds too
>> much complexity for a small return.
>
> Thanks. Attaching the above patch.
I agree that the addition of DB_IN_END_OF_RECOVERY_CHECKPOINT is not
necessary as the control file state will be reflected in a live server
once it the instance is ready to write WAL after promotion, as much as
I agree that the state stored in the control file because of the
end-of-recovery record does not reflect the reality.
Now, I also find confusing the state of CreateCheckpoint() once this
patch gets applied. Now the code and comments imply that an
end-of-recovery checkpoint is a shutdown checkpoint because they
perform the same actions, which is fine. Could it be less confusing
to remove completely the "shutdown" variable instead and replace those
checks with "flags"? What the patch is doing is one step in this
direction.
--
Michael
