Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date
Msg-id YdVS+X4SNXO93Oib@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:51:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I may have missed one thing or two, but I think that's pretty much
> what we should be looking for to do the switch to TAP in terms of
> coverage.

Rebased patch to cool down the CF bot, as per the addition of
--no-sync to pg_upgrade.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring of compression options in pg_basebackup
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication