Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id YIbdhrfemBnwAvl5@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > Agreed.  If pg_stat_statements were zero-configuration today then
> > this would be an annoying new burden, but it isn't.
> 
> I think people can understand "add pg_stat_statements to
> shared_preload_libraries" and "install the extension".  You have to turn it
> on somehow after all.

Fwiw, I'd claim that pg_stat_statements *is* zero-configuration today.
You just have to load the module (= shared_preload_libraries), and it
will start working. Later you can run CREATE EXTENSION to actually see
the stats, but they are already being collected in the background.

> Now there is the additional burden of turning on this weird setting that no
> one understands.  That's a 50% increase in burden.
> 
> And almost no one will want to use a nondefault setting.
> 
> pg_stat_statements is pretty popular.  I think leaving in this requirement
> will lead to widespread confusion and complaints.

Ack, please make the default config (i.e. after setting shared_preload_libraries)
do something sensible. Having to enable some "weird" internal other setting
will be very hard to explain to users.

Fwiw, I'd even want to have pg_stat_statements enabled in core by
default. That would awesome UX. (And turning off could be as simple as
setting compute_query_id=off.)

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue in recent pg_stat_statements?
Next
From: David Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue in recent pg_stat_statements?