Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id Y3QJx+8KnVEs3WOM@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:57:49PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 06:14:25PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Hmm, really?  It seems to me that we will have two slightly different
>> behaviors in 15 and master, which may be confusing later on.  I think
>> it'd be better to make them both work identically.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion either way.  While consistency between v15
> and master seems nice, the behavior change might not be appropriate for a
> minor release.  BTW I was able to cherry-pick the committed patch to v15
> without any changes.  Peter, could you clarify what changes you'd like to
> see in a back-patched version?

FWIW, I am not sure that I would have done d627ce3 as I already
mentioned upthread as the library loading should not be related to
archive_command.  If there is support more support in doing that, I am
fine to withdraw, but the behavior between HEAD and REL_15_STABLE
ought to be consistent.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs