Re: BYTEA - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Andreas Joseph Krogh
Subject Re: BYTEA
Date
Msg-id VisenaEmail.a6.78adcc60bfbadadb.15251a22a3f@tc7-visena
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BYTEA  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: BYTEA
List pgsql-sql
På søndag 17. januar 2016 kl. 21:29:08, skrev Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>:
On 01/17/2016 11:33 AM, Eugene Yin wrote:
> Pg 9.4+
>
> Storing binary data using bytea
> <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/datatype-binary.html> or text
> <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/datatype-character.html> data
> types
>
>   * Pluses
>       o Storing and Accessing entry utilizes the same interface when
>         accessing any other data type or record.
>       o No need to track OID of a "large object" you create
>   * Minus
>       o bytea and text data type both use TOAST
>         <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/storage-toast.html>
>         (details here <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TOAST>)
>           + limited to 1G per entry
>           + 4 Billion (> 2KB) entries per table max
>             <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TOAST>.
>       o *Need to escape/encode binary data before sending to DB then do
>         the reverse after retrieving the data *
>       o Memory requirements on the server can be steep even on a small
>         record set.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/BinaryFilesInDB
>
>
>
> Do I  really *Need to escape/encode binary data before sending to DB
> then do the reverse after retrieving the data?*
> *
> *
> If so, what (*Java*) codes should I use to achieve this goal (I am using
> the Java to interface with the DB)?

https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/94/binary-data.html
 
Save yourself the trouble and don't go this route. Use https://github.com/impossibl/pgjdbc-ng instead.
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 
Attachment

pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Re: BLOBs
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: BYTEA