On 1/10/16 10:01 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> pg_largeobject being a system-relation does quite make sense to me, but
> that's another discussion. I know there has been some discussions in the
> past about making it a non system-relation but it never got anywhere AFAIK.
BTW, there's some other issues with large objects, notably their use of
OIDs. Lots of LOs can lead to OID depletion. There was a thread about
this recently.
It might be about time to come up with an extension that's a replacement
for large objects.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
What would it take to fund such an extension?
It would "have to" support:
- Migrate existing LOs away from pg_largeobject
- Proper driver-support (JDBC)
- Possible to exclude from pg_dump
- Support pg_upgrade
And -hackers should agree on the goal to ultimately being merged into core and replace pg_largeobject.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963