Re: jdbc large object support ?? - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Joachim Achtzehnter
Subject Re: jdbc large object support ??
Date
Msg-id Pine.WNT.4.21.0007191355090.148-100000@van4
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jdbc large object support ??  (John Thorhauer <jthorhauer@phoenixcolor.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, John Thorhauer wrote:
>
> Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
> >
> > Take a look at the mailing list archive. This question was discussed in
> > great detail during the last couple of days. You use setBytes() and
> > getBytes() instead of streams, for details see the archive.
> >
>
> OK.  I looked at that and I saw someone mention something about using
> the text type to store data.  What I am doing is trying to store xml
> files in postgres.

Was not referring to the use of the text type, but rather to the lengthy
discussion about how one can use Postgresql large objects via JDBC. Just
read all of yesterday's messages with "setBytes" or "Blob" in the subject
line. This was all about large object (BLOB) support.

Joachim




pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: John Thorhauer
Date:
Subject: Re: jdbc large object support ??
Next
From: Joseph Shraibman
Date:
Subject: Cursors and JDBC