Re: [HACKERS] psql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Nailah Ogeer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] psql
Date
Msg-id Pine.SOL.4.33.0306201328310.4641-100000@innovate
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] psql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] psql
List pgsql-general
Well here's the thing. Before i was trying to use ShmemInitStruct in
buf_init.c. The problem with this is that you can't shrink or grow shared
memory. That is why i switched over and just used malloc. So i seem to be
in a big dilemma, on one hand, if i use malloc, i can't keep this info i
need; and on the other if i use shmeminitstruct then i can't shrink or
grow the BP clusters.
But i will try to test your hypothesis to see if shared memory will take
care of this.

On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Nailah Ogeer <ogeer@cs.queensu.ca> writes:
> > So what is happening is that i enter the relation ids into the BP cluster
> > linked list fine and every time i call psql, it automatically deletes.
>
> Sounds to me like you are trying to keep stuff in backend-local memory
> that needs to be in shared memory.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Csaba Nagy
Date:
Subject: Re: Incremental backups, and backup history
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: dropping sequences