Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dustin Sallings
Subject Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres
Date
Msg-id Pine.SGI.3.95.990426112052.13754D-100000@bleu.west.spy.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres  (Chris Bitmead <chris.bitmead@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Chris Bitmead wrote:

# > IDE is just plain slow on Unix.  Unix does much better with SCSI,
# > especially when there are multiple disks.
#
# Oh I don't know. If you've only got 1 or 2 disks you may find IDE
# sufficient. (well it works nicely for me.)

    Works != works as well as SCSI.  I've yet to find an example where
IDE works as well as SCSI in real life (vs. benchmarks).  My real life
scenarios rarely involve telling a machine to be still so we can do a disk
read, then again for a disk write.

# People have been commenting lately that postgres on Solaris is very slow
# compared to Linux. Apparently certain file system operations on Solaris
# is _slow_.

    Slow, however more robust than the same in Linux.  Linux achieves
a lot of speed by throwing away safety nets.  Sometimes, these safety nets
are important.

--
SA, beyond.com           My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Oseas Rodrigues
Date:
Subject: Using postgresql with perl 5.0
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres