Re: SCSI vs SATA - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Charles Sprickman
Subject Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date
Msg-id Pine.OSX.4.64.0704061838560.23748@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SCSI vs SATA  (david@lang.hm)
Responses Re: SCSI vs SATA  (david@lang.hm)
Re: SCSI vs SATA  (Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, david@lang.hm wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> Based on experience I think that on average server drives are more
>> reliable than consumer grade drives, and can take more punishment.
>
> this I am not sure about

I think they should survey Tivo owners next time.

Perfect stress-testing environment.  Mine runs at over 50C most of the
time, and it's writing 2 video streams 24/7.  What more could you do to
punish a drive? :)

Charles


>
> David Lang
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: david@lang.hm
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Next
From: david@lang.hm
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA