Re: index on a box - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dustin Sallings
Subject Re: index on a box
Date
Msg-id Pine.OSX.4.33.0106211358420.396-100000@dustinmobile
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: index on a box  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: index on a box
List pgsql-general
Around 11:08 on Jun 21, 2001, Tom Lane said:

# If you say "SET enable_seqscan TO off", and repeat the EXPLAIN, do you
# get an indexscan plan?

Seq Scan on tmp  (cost=100000000.00..100002500.84 rows=30434 width=92)

# I don't recommend doing such a SET for production purposes, but if
# this works then the problem is just inaccurate selectivity/cost
# estimation. I see that the on_pb operator has no selectivity estimator
# defined at all :-( ... as a quick hack, try setting its oprrest and
# oprjoin to be areasel and areajoinsel.

    I'm not sure what you just said.  :)

--
SPY                      My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Stock, Stuart H."
Date:
Subject: RE: Error: cannot write block XX of XXXXX/XXXXX blind: resource tempo rarily unavailable
Next
From: "Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos"
Date:
Subject: strange way to crash