Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.3.95.980219150329.17102d-100000@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >     Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > > > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place?  It sounds to me like we are
> > > > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
> > > > >
> > > > > grant/revoke works for copy.
> > > >
> > > >     Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > > > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
> > >
> > > Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?
> >
> >     Don't think so - not really hard tested.
>
> If you think you can get it in with light testing by the beta people,
> Marc might bite on it.

    There is nothing wrong with doing what we did last time...we have,
what, 7 post-release patches for v6.2.1?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Next
From: Brook Milligan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform status