On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> The bad point is not that we would rollback the transaction. The bad
> point is what happens when you need to rollback a transaction and in
> your scenario it is quite plausible that a large rollback could occur,
> more than once, causing the requirement of something like a vacuum full
> to clean things up.
Yes, I understand, but I think, the scenario of working and always
hitting a quota is not normal. I think you shouldn't expect perfect,
stable performance etc. in that case. It's similar to if you'll try to
work with PG with very little memory and/or shared memory. You can work,
but you can easily hit these limits, and than something will not work...
regards, Sergey
*******************************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Cambridge Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute
Tel: +49-6221-528-349
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: math@sai.msu.ru
