Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Lang
Subject Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.62.0608090930400.9699@qnivq.ynat.uz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>>> Ahh and which companies would these be? As a representative of the most
>>> prominent one in the  US I can tell you that you are not speaking from a
>>> knowledgeable position.
>>
>> note I said many, not all. I am aware that your company does not fall into
>> this catagory.
>
> I know, but I am curious as to *what* companies. Any reputable PostgreSQL
> company is going to support Linux as a whole except maybe some fringe distros
> like Gentoo or RedFlag. Not to mention FreeBSD and Solaris.

I'm not going to name names in public, but I will point out that different
companies definitions of what constatutes 'fringe distros' are different.
For some any linux other then RedHat Enterprise or SuSE is a fringe distro
(with SuSE being a relativly recent addition, for a while RedHat were
frequently the only supported distro versions)

and please note, when I'm talking about support, it's not just postgresql
support, but also hardware/driver support that can run into these problems

David Lang

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good