Re: ice-broker scan thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: ice-broker scan thread
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0511291524470.18419@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ice-broker scan thread  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ice-broker scan thread  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
Re: ice-broker scan thread  (Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> > I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO
>
> Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
> to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
> this in.  Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
> worth the trouble.

The architecture I am looking at would not rely on threads.

I didn't want to jump on list and waive my hands until I had something to
show, but since Qingqing is looking at the issue I thought I better raise
it.

Gavin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread