Re: Strange RETURN NEXT behaviour in Postgres 8.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sergey E. Koposov
Subject Re: Strange RETURN NEXT behaviour in Postgres 8.0
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0502170023550.14831-100000@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange RETURN NEXT behaviour in Postgres 8.0  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Richard Huxton wrote:
> This is just a shot in the dark, but I don't suppose you've dropped or 
> modified any columns in "usno" have you?
> 
> I seem to remember some subtle problems with dropped columns and plpgsql 
> functions - could be one of those still left. It'd look like tablesize 
> was the problem because of course no-one's got time to test with 500 
> million test rows.

1) I have static tables. I dont modify them!
2) My test table is q3c (with 2 rows), and the table with 500 millions of
rows is not test table, it is the table with data :-)



> --
>    Richard Huxton
>    Archonet Ltd
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange RETURN NEXT behaviour in Postgres 8.0
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: how to make table inherits another ?