Re: Point in Time Recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Devrim GUNDUZ
Subject Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0407160103091.688-100000@emo.org.tr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Point in Time Recovery  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Point in Time Recovery
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Simon,

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Simon Riggs wrote:

> > We will get there --- it just seems dark at this time.
> 
> Thanks for that. My comments were heartfelt, but not useful right now. 
> 
> I'm badly overdrawn already on my time budget, though that is my concern
> alone. There is more to do than I have time for. Pragmatically, if we
> aren't going to get there then I need to stop now, so I can progress
> other outstanding issues. All help is appreciated.

Personally, as a PostgreSQL Advocate, I believe that PITR is one of the 
most important missing features in PostgreSQL. I've been keeping 'all' of 
you e-mails about PITR and I'm really excited with that feature. 

Please do not stop working on PITR. I'm pretty sure that most of the 
'silent' people in the lists are waiting for PITR for an {Oracle, DB2, ...}-killer 
database. In my country (Turkey), too many people spend a lot of 
money for  proprietary databases, just for some missing features in 
PostgreSQL. If you finish your work on PITR (and other guys on NT, Win32 
port, etc), then we'll feel more concentrated on PostgreSQL Advocation, so 
that PostgreSQL will be used more and more. (Oh, we also need native 
clustering...)

Maybe I should send this e-mail offlist, but I wanted everyone to learn my 
feelings.

Regards and best wishes,
- -- 
Devrim GUNDUZ           
devrim~gunduz.org                devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr         http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA9wKxtl86P3SPfQ4RAms+AJ95RfFi0lVwMD7u7zQ/DzLFEBC8MACgvRzd
HRqAjVqI3hekwImPpqelj9U=
=l445
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] serverlog rotation/functions