Re: RHEL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Craig O'Shannessy
Subject Re: RHEL
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311131551150.14188-100000@mail.ucw.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RHEL  (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>)
Responses Re: RHEL
Re: RHEL
List pgsql-general
So, what ever happened to the "RedHat database"?  I though RH was going to
be hiring core PostgreSQL developers?  Anyone got a URL to explain what
happened to this venture?  Sorry if I'm getting a little OT here.

Craig

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:

> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:57 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Adam Haberlach <adam@newsnipple.com> writes:
> > >     I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can
> > > tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES
>
> > Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about this.
>
> > (Not totally unbiased here ... I'm getting *very* tired about RH's
> > internal indecision about their extent of commitment to Postgres.
> > I think frequent whacks-upside-the-head from paying customers may
> > be the only way to get upper management to sit up and take notice.)
>
> The RHEL3 beta (taroon) had rh-postgresql-server built and included.  Does
> RHEL3 not include this package?
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Murtagh
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql return setof integer?
Next
From: Ma Siva Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: multibyte support [Resolved]