Re: RHEL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: RHEL
Date
Msg-id 200311122333.54417.lowen@pari.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RHEL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RHEL  ("Craig O'Shannessy" <craig@ucw.com.au>)
Re: RHEL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:57 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Haberlach <adam@newsnipple.com> writes:
> >     I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can
> > tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES

> Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about this.

> (Not totally unbiased here ... I'm getting *very* tired about RH's
> internal indecision about their extent of commitment to Postgres.
> I think frequent whacks-upside-the-head from paying customers may
> be the only way to get upper management to sit up and take notice.)

The RHEL3 beta (taroon) had rh-postgresql-server built and included.  Does
RHEL3 not include this package?
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql return setof integer?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system