Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311010000500.1528-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> nothing happens, because the revoke is implicitly assumed to mean
> "revoke whatever privileges I granted", and Larry's superuser hasn't
> granted any.  The public privileges on language SQL were granted by
> user postgres, and they remain in force.  So the later CREATE FUNCTION
> that the test expects to fail, succeeds.
>
> Is this a bug, or is it correct-per-spec behavior?

It's correct.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: out of date bufmgr README
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test