Re: Call for port reports - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Call for port reports
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0310311733440.15991-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for port reports  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for port reports
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Odd.  I count ten inline functions in the backend:

> Why would only three of them fail?

I just remembered this Autoconf change:

2002-03-28  Kevin Ryde  <user42@zip.com.au>
       * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_INLINE): Test with a typedef return value,       to avoid versions of HP C which don't
allowthat.
 

So there you have it.  Do we want to backpatch the new autoconf test, or
define inline to empty for this particular version of this platform, or
try to do without typedef'd types?  I prefer option 1.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: static pg_dump
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM