Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Michael Pohl
Subject Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0309151154220.10153-100000@server1.techplant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?  (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexey Borzov wrote:

> Michael Pohl wrote:
>
> > As a side note, I appreciate the PgSQL community's apparent commitment to
> > avoid both FUD and overstatement of PgSQL's capabilities.
>
> If you look closely at my list, it has no overstatements. It has no
> false statements either, everything can be backed up by appropriate links.

I did not mean to imply that your list contained overstatements.  I was
making a general statement about the tone I've noticed on the PgSQL
mailing lists and web site, vs. what I've noticed in other projects.  I
apologize for not being clear.

michael


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Alexey Borzov
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?