Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0309012336330.1206-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark writes:

> Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it's true, but in practice
> why would an OS have some *_r but have only non-thread-safe versions of
> others?

The question is whether configure can reliably identify whether various
*_r functions exist.  I think it can't.  For example, they could be in a
separate library that we don't know about.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: massive quotes?