Tom Lane writes:
> It would take an hour or two's work to put together a standalone version
> of rotatelogs.c (one that doesn't depend on the Apache Portable Runtime
> library). Seems well worth it to me. Does anyone have an objection to
> doing this?
Or we could take the one I posted, which does exactly the same thing as
Apache's (at least about a year ago, not sure where the APR plays in
nowadays), thus shortcircuiting that porting effort.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
