Tom Lane writes:
> I find that two geometry 'expected' files are now sufficient to cover
> all the platforms I have available to test. (We'd only need one, if
> everyone displayed minus zero as '-0', but some platforms print '0'.)
Judging from the platforms affected by this, I would suspect that this is
a (mis-)feature of the snprintf() implementation rather than compiler or
processor. Would it make sense to provide a fixed version of snprintf()
and get rid of these differences?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
