On Friday 15 November 2002 10:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > To the rest of the hackers, is it normal practice to perhaps vote in a
> > new member of the steering committee?
>
> Uh ... it's never happened before ... so there is no "normal practice".
IMHO, replacement of a core member should be treated the same as bringing in a
new core member, which, IIRC, is by invitation and vote of the balance of the
core members.
If a replacement is immediately necessary, that is. Having five core versus
six core isn't a great handicap, as the potential replacement pool consists
of people who are already doing development now. Having an odd number of
core has its advantages.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
