Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0209161837000.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Justin Clift writes:

> WinNT/2k/XP costs a few hundred dollars.
>
> MS SQL Server costs a few thousand dollars.

The places that run Windows can be categorized into three camps:  (1)
Those that don't have a clue.  They will never run PostgreSQL.  (2) Those
that are somehow afraid to switch to a different solution.  They will be
even more hesitant to switch to PostgreSQL.  (3) Those that somehow like
Windows. They will like MS SQL Server as well, no matter what we do.

So where is the market?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: directional marks