Re: Patch for pt_BR (libpq) - part two - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Patch for pt_BR (libpq) - part two
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0208291816040.1108-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch for pt_BR (libpq) - part two  (Rijndael AES Cipher <sartre@alltv.com.br>)
List pgsql-patches
Rijndael AES Cipher writes:

>     This file goes to src/interfaces/libpq and nls.mk must include an
> extra pt_BR only. make maintainer-check also pointed a correct '82
> translated messages'.

Is there a strong reason not to simply use "pt"?

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] worried about PGPASSWORD drop
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: swedish pg_controldata