Re: SET LOCAL again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: SET LOCAL again
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0207301834330.24511-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET LOCAL again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SET LOCAL again
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> > As an alternative syntax I can suggest
>
> > SET name TO value [ ON COMMIT RESET ];
>
> Ugh.  Why can't we stick with SET LOCAL?

SET LOCAL is already used for something else in the SQL standard.  Not
sure if we'll ever implement that, but it's something to be concerned
about.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: What exactly does lanispl mean?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: What exactly does lanispl mean?