Bruce Momjian writes:
> Can we move them to src/port rather than src/utils? Port makes more
> sense to me because that's what they are. Maybe is should be called
> src/libc?
Well, there is a bit of a history in picking a really silly name for this
library. GCC calls it libiberty, Kerberos calls it libroken. Make up
your own. "port" makes sense, though.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
