Re: Future of src/utils - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Future of src/utils
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0207172056500.9047-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Future of src/utils  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Future of src/utils  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> > assemble all the files we need (as determined by configure) into a static
> > library and link all executables with that.  That way we don't have to
> > deal with the individual files in each individual makefile.
>
> I like that a lot.  But will it work for libpq?

No, just for executables.  Otherwise you'd get into a big PIC mess.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Future of src/utils