Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0309190949180.14562-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Responses Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)
Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 00:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> > > ... Being honest and fair will win
> > > hearts and minds, and when they need the Saturn 4 instead of the Estes
> > > rocket, they'll remember who to come to.
> >
> > I like this analogy, though maybe you've overstretched.  Perhaps:
> >
> > MySQL = Estes.  Put in InnoDB, and you have a D engine ... but it's
> > still a model rocket.
> >
> > Postgres = Titan II.  Can boost LEO missions or small interplanetary
> > probes.  Never mind its ICBM heritage ;-)
>
> All US (government) and Soviet/Russian rockets have ICBM roots.
>
> > Oracle = Saturn IV.  Can take you to the moon ... if you can afford
> > the price tag.
>
> What's a Saturn IV?  Do you mean the Saturn V?

http://www.aviation-central.com/space/usm50.htm


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Column defaults fail with rules on view
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Column defaults fail with rules on view