Re: Activate Index - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Activate Index |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309041720270.28916-100000@css120.ihs.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Activate Index ("Edwin Quijada" <listas_quijada@hotmail.com>) |
List | pgsql-general |
You want this document: http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html great article on performance tuning postgresql. After reading it and digesting all you can, you should have a noticeably faster machine. On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Edwin Quijada wrote: > ok! > U can tell me about the best setup and performance? > and best parameters to setup I am so newbie ? > I am using Postgres to emigrate a system in 4D Server to PgSql With Delphi > for insurance company. > My server is Pentium IV 2.0 Ghz , 1 GB Ram, 40 GB HD 7200RPM? > Now I wanna know what is the best setup > > > > >From: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> > >To: Edwin Quijada <listas_quijada@hotmail.com> > >CC: <mattias@kregert.se>, <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> > >Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Activate Index > >Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:58:57 -0600 (MDT) > > > >What query are you running? > > > >If you run > > > >select * from indexed_table > > > >you'll get a seq scan because you're hitting every row. > > > >If you're doing > > > >select * from indexed_table where indexed_field=1 > > > >you should get an index scan. > > > >Anything in between the query planner will decide. Unlike some older > >databases that used a rules based planner, postgresql uses a cost based > >planner. I.e. it figures out which "costs" more, a seq scan or an index > >scan, and chooses accordingly. > > > >In order to do this properly, it needs to know how your data is laid out. > >Have you run analyze on your database? > > > >If the query planner still makes the wrong you can force things with "set > >enable_seqscan = off" temporarily to see if postgresql really is making > >the best choice. Then run your query with "explain analyze " at the front > >and postgresql will run the query, report back how it ran it, how much it > >THOUGHT it would cost, and how long it really took. > > > >Then, you can tune your database by messing about with random_page_cost, > >cpu*cost (3 different vars) effective_cache_size, shared_buffers, and > >sort_mem. > > > >Postgresql is like a large complex piece of machinery that runs great once > >it's been setup, but suffers from pretty mediocre performance in it's > >default installation format due to the need to start on some pretty > >ancient operating systems / hardware setups. Lately, some of those > >defaults have been increased a bit, but they're still small for a > >workgroup or enterprise class database. > > > > > >On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Edwin Quijada wrote: > > > > > > > > Well , My table has 380000 records!!! > > > > > > > > > >From: "Mattias Kregert" <mattias@kregert.se> > > > >To: "Edwin Quijada" <listas_quijada@hotmail.com> > > > >Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Activate Index > > > >Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:58:33 +0200 > > > > > > > >Hello Edwin, > > > > > > > >The index will be used automatically when you have enough rows in the > > > >table. For tables with a small number of rows, a seq scan will be made > > > >because it is actually faster than using the index with a small number > >of > > > >rows. > > > > > > > >You also have to remember to run VACUUM from time to time, so that the > > > >statistics are updated so the planner can see how many rows are in the > > > >table. > > > > > > > > > > > >/Mattias > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Edwin Quijada" <listas_quijada@hotmail.com> > > > >To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> > > > >Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:02 PM > > > >Subject: [GENERAL] Activate Index > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi!! > > > > > This is my first post to the list. I have a problem. > > > > > I have a table with a two index , int4, but when I do a search using > >the > > > > > field indexed but when I applied an explain to the query it says Seq > > > >Scan , > > > > > I mean , that it doesnot use the index. > > > > > I cant use the cast field::int4 because I use delphi and delphi does > >not > > > > > support this. > > > > > I know there is a command to activate index aand always postgrres > >will > > > >be > > > > > the index > > > > > Which are this command??? > > > > > Anyone knows? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *-------------------------------------------------------* > > > > > *-Edwin Quijada > > > > > *-Developer DataBase > > > > > *-JQ Microsistemas > > > > > *-809-747-2787 > > > > > * " Si deseas lograr cosas excepcionales debes de hacer cosas fuera > >de > > > >lo > > > > > comun" > > > > > *-------------------------------------------------------* > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > ¿Estás buscando un auto nuevo? http://www.yupimsn.com/autos/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > >broadcast)--------------------------- > > > > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > ¿Estás buscando un auto nuevo? http://www.yupimsn.com/autos/ > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger: > http://messenger.yupimsn.com/ > >
pgsql-general by date: